On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 05:56:19PM -0400, Andrew Braverman wrote: >Sorry. Missed that one. It is attached now.
Doh. I was hoping that if I saw the cygwin version from the cygcheck output I would be able to figure out the stack dump but I've removed the debugging version of cygwin 1.3.22 that I'd need to do that. If you want to try the latest (i.e., the soon to be uploaded June 2 version) cygwin snapshot DLL and send the stackdump file again, I should be able to say where it is dying from the hex address. cgf
