<http://cygwin.com/>, in the "Contributing" section of the left menu, follow the "Snapshots" link. Igor
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Andrew Braverman wrote: > You did say that and I misread it. I have been looking for a 1.3.23 package > and, after checking a half a dozen or so mirrors, have not seen one. Has it > been released yet? Is there an ETA? > > -Andy > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christopher Faylor > > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 10:49 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Problem with releases since -37 > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:38:52AM -0400, Andrew Braverman wrote: > > >I updated the XWin package to -42 and changed nothing else. The new > > >stackdump is attached. Thank you again for all the help. > > > > I was talking about the latest CYGWIN DLL, not the latest XWin > > package. > > > > >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > > Christopher Faylor > > >> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 7:44 PM > > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> Subject: Re: Problem with releases since -37 > > >> > > >>On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 05:56:19PM -0400, Andrew Braverman wrote: > > >>>Sorry. Missed that one. It is attached now. > > >> > > >>Doh. I was hoping that if I saw the cygwin version from > > the cygcheck > > >>output I would be able to figure out the stack dump but I've removed > > >>the debugging version of cygwin 1.3.22 that I'd need to do that. > > >> > > >>If you want to try the latest (i.e., the soon to be uploaded June 2 > > >>version) cygwin snapshot DLL and send the stackdump file again, I > > >>should be able to say where it is dying from the hex address. -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D. '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! "I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route to the bathroom is a major career booster." -- Patrick Naughton
