Eric Blake wrote: > we now have implementations in the wild that differ in behavior, and > use security as a reason for the divergence, it is worth getting that > clarified in POSIX. I'll file a bug against POSIX shortly
For the reference, the systems that return ENOEXEC for posix_spawnp attempting to execute a script without #! marker are: - glibc/Linux ≥ 2.15 - glibc/Hurd ≥ 2.33 (commit 13adfa34aff03fd9f1c1612b537a0d736ddb6c2b) - musl libc Bruno -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
