On Fri, 23 May 2025, Jeremy Drake wrote: > Maybe. MSYS2 doesn't generally advise to rebase on x86_64, but I think > Cygwin does as part of its setup/postinstall hooks. As a hack, I was able > to work around this by setting the "dynamicbase" flag on the dlls (it's a > long story about why this helps rather than hurts in this particular case)
I believe it is ASLR right? I thought cygwin doesn't support such DLLs on fork. If it helps here, should I add this flag for all DLLs & EXEs compiled by Rust? -- Yuyi Wang -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple