On Fri, 23 May 2025, Yuyi Wang wrote: > On Fri, 23 May 2025, Jeremy Drake wrote: > > Maybe. MSYS2 doesn't generally advise to rebase on x86_64, but I think > > Cygwin does as part of its setup/postinstall hooks. As a hack, I was able > > to work around this by setting the "dynamicbase" flag on the dlls (it's a > > long story about why this helps rather than hurts in this particular case) > > I believe it is ASLR right? I thought cygwin doesn't support such DLLs on > fork.
Right > If it helps here, should I add this flag for all DLLs & EXEs compiled by Rust? No. -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
