On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 9:06 PM ASSI via Cygwin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jon Turney via Cygwin writes: > > It does seem that both libssl1.1 and libssl3 have this file (which is > > permitted). > > Oh I forgot about this wart… that only rears it's ugly head when both > packages are installed in the same run, though. Now what pulls in > libssl1.1 still on a fresh Cygwin install?
1. Fresh machine 2. curl --remote-name "https://www.cygwin.com/setup-x86_64.exe"; 3. .\setup-x86_64.exe -q --site "https://mirrors.kernel.org/sourceware/cygwin"; -P cygwin,cygwin-devel,cygrunsrv,cygutils,cygutils-extra,bash,bzip2,coreutils,getent,gdb,grep,hostname,less,libiconv,libiconv2,pax,pbzip2,procps-ng,sed,tar,time,util-linux,p7zip,wget,libnfs-utils,make,bmake,git,dos2unix,unzip That does trigger that warning. Aurélien -- Aurélien Couderc <[email protected]> Big Data/Data mining expert, chess enthusiast -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
