On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 11:26:32PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: >>>>fifos just barely work under cygwin. I wouldn't recommend using them. >>> >>>Yes, it appears that they are heavily broken. >> >>So when I say "fifos just barely work" you felt the need to inform me >>that they don't work? And that advances the discussion how, exactly? >> > >And your pathological touchiness serves what purpose exactly? Take >your meds already. Christ.
By the way, I think I've previously implied that I don't appreciate the use of this kind of profanity here. I would appreciate it if you would refrain from using this type of language in the cygwin mailing lists. Re: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-03/msg00299.html cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
