On 20 November 2007 18:39, Reini Urban wrote: > 2007/11/20, Christopher Faylor: > ... >> Indeed, this is very interesting. It sounds a little like the >> autoload.cc code in Cygwin which handles optional linking from dlls but it >> is obviously much more advanced. > > Where should it go to? > Puttin it into libtool sounds nearest to me, to work around -no-undefined.
(Without having actually specced out the implementation yet,) I don't see why we couldn't do this trick entirely in ld, with a support routine or two in libgcc. It can't go entirely into libtool, I would have thought; it requires some additional code at runtime. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/