On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 09:03:50AM -0700, jim bell wrote: > I guess I'm still not being clear. It would be my way of objecting to a > court's ordering the telecom company that I might work for (or, one day, that > I might own?!?) to present an "electronically-readable" form of the telephone > metadata of millions of telephones. The judge ordered that; my sneaky > response would be to generate an "electronically-readable" file, basically a > pdf file or a series of same, itself with an image that looks like "captcha" > information: relatively easy for a human to read, but rather difficult for > any computer to turn into easily-useable (searchable) information. In other > words, the information would be presented to the NSA, but it would be > essentially unuseable without being (first) human-decoded.
assuming this is correct: http://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.de/2014/04/street-view-and-recaptcha-technology.html then googlestreetview tech is better at solving captchas than humans.
