Also.. https://twitter.com/TheBlogPirate/status/471759810644283392
On 28/05/14 21:48, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2014, at 03:27 PM, Bernard Tyers wrote: >> There is a thread on the twitters at the moment about this: >> >> https://twitter.com/runasand/status/471740622031032320 >> >> - The the signature of the .exe still verifies. >> - The key seems to be legit: >> https://www.google.nl/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=gUaGU_fmJ8eyOsvogYgF#q=c5f4+bac4+a7b2+2db8+b8f8+5538+e3ba+73ca+f0d6+F0D6+B1E0 > > Truecrypt was cross-platform. BitLocker isn't. LUKS isn't. Whatever > MacOS X uses isn't. Until and unless there are GPL/BSD licensed versions > of BitLocker for MacOS X, GNU/Linux, etc then they aren't true > replacements for Truecrypt. > -- T: @onetruecathal, @IndieBBDNA P: +353876363185 W: http://indiebiotech.com
0x988B9099.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
