My suspicion is that either they were hacked (and had their key stolen), or that they were ordered to shutdown and recommend Microsoft's (presumably backdoored) BitLocker as a replacement. BitLocker's enterprise documentation makes me *incredibly* suspicious that it is susceptible to monitoring by third-parties.

Even being embarrassed by whatever bugs the second phase audit uncovered wouldn't explain the sudden recommendation. And why not ecryptfs or ~literally anything else~ ?

  Pardon my tinfoil hat.

~Griffin

Reply via email to