On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Cathal Garvey < [email protected]> wrote:
> I wouldn't say "true", I'd say "proto". In the end, you're still relying > on a central point of trust, in this case Keybase, for a lot of the key > distribution, but as a way to bootstrap a WoT that can outgrow Keybase I > think it looks really promising. I'm not one to shirk hackish solutions > in favour of purity, because purity has barely worked in decades of PGP > WoT building. > > Speaking of Keybase, anyone got an invite? :) > I've been very impressed with how Keybase has evolved, and how well they explain their model to users. It is without a doubt what I'd recommend to a semi- or un-technical user to get them started. They have a walkthrough of their approach to security and threat models here: https://keybase.io/docs/server_security And they explain "tracking" in detail here: https://keybase.io/docs/tracking > > On 20/06/14 17:03, MrBiTs wrote: > > Hello, guys > > > > > > Keybase.io seems to be a great tool to create a true WoT. Are anybody in > there? They are working with invitations. > > > > CheerS > > > > > > -- > T: @onetruecathal, @IndieBBDNA > P: +353876363185 > W: http://indiebiotech.com > -- konklone.com | @konklone <https://twitter.com/konklone>
