On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 02:23:10PM -0500, Eric Mill wrote: > > > > > I meant USGOV protects USGOV. (Although not USGOV employees per se...) > > > Cybersecurity wise USGOV probably doesn't/hardly need HTTPS, > > > depending on the abilities of adversaries. > > > > Of course. US govt using https in their stupid propaganda > > websites is irrelant. What is weird is that some US govt > > employee bothered to advertise it here. Is he clueless? > > Was he trolling? > > > > I wasn't trolling. I've been a member of this list, and paying close > attention to the field, since well before I joined the US government (which > happened back in May). >
Dude, don't take it personally but I consider you of type $X$. By an axiom of mine type $X$ sucks, sorry. Have you considered to do something about the Detroit bankruptcy, estimated at $18–20 billion : http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Detroit_bankruptcy&oldid=634222478
