Dnia wtorek, 18 listopada 2014 14:23:10 Eric Mill pisze: > > > I meant USGOV protects USGOV. (Although not USGOV employees per se...) > > > Cybersecurity wise USGOV probably doesn't/hardly need HTTPS, > > > depending on the abilities of adversaries. > > > > > Of course. US govt using https in their stupid propaganda > > websites is irrelant. What is weird is that some US govt > > employee bothered to advertise it here. Is he clueless? > > Was he trolling? > > I wasn't trolling. I've been a member of this list, and paying close > attention to the field, since well before I joined the US government (which > happened back in May). > > Before this, I worked for 5 years at a relatively adversarial non-profit > group focused on government transparency, called the Sunlight Foundation.
Oh my. Now get ready for the trolls doing reverse-jumping-to-conclusions that Sunlight Foundation must be a USGOV front. Anywhoo, thanks for sharing, and keep up the good work. I subscribe to the idea that if something brings more encryption to the open web, it's a good idea. -- Pozdr rysiek
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
