On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 07:00:24AM -0500, grarpamp wrote: > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Georgi Guninski <[email protected]> wrote: > > Building just the kernel with clang is likely possibly, but > > bare kernel is not a distro. > > > > Till recently, I believe one couldn't build desktop > > environment only with clang, might be wrong on this. > > As in the links, the entire FreeBSD kernel, base, > and most of it's ~25,000 ports build with clang. X, > browsers, whatever. The others are not as far along. > Not bad considering clang itself is a "till recently".
Thanks, probably i should stop trolling bsd for gcc so far, except for historical reasons that RMS & co gave them the toolchain to get started and be alive. I suppose _some_ of the ~25,000 ports _don't build_ with clang, giving me a short opportunity of trolling -- you still need gcc for _all_ ports?
