Dnia niedziela, 11 stycznia 2015 19:41:44 Juan pisze: > On Sun, 11 Jan 2015 23:09:41 +0100 > > rysiek <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dnia niedziela, 11 stycznia 2015 18:34:24 Juan pisze: > > > > I would say: that individuals should have the right to use their > > > > *tools* however they like, including fixing them, modifying them > > > > and helping their neighbours by lending them. > > > > > > Which boils down to : this is my stuff - I do with it > > > > > > whatever I want. > > > > So, if I write a program, whose "stuff" is it? Mine? Yours if you're > > using it? the "boils down to" is a bit simplified, isn't it. > > I was referring to physical property - computer hardware in this > case. Again, the argument is that since people own the hardware > they should control it (otherwise they don't really own it).
Hence we agree (and Stallman, too). > If you write a program you are the author. You can keep it > secret but you can't prevent people from copying it/using it > if you somehow make it public. As to who 'owns' it, the > question doesn't make much sense because, again, intellectual > 'property' doesn't really work liky physical property. So again, agreed. :) -- Pozdrawiam, Michał "rysiek" Woźniak Zmieniam klucz GPG :: http://rys.io/pl/147 GPG Key Transition :: http://rys.io/en/147
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
