Blind signature scheme to guarantee person:income-key correspondence without breaking the privacy of who each represents? However, you'd need to give each person as many signed private keys as transactions they're likely to use each income-cycle to avoid spending-correlation deanonymysation.
On 25 May 2015 17:46:22 GMT+01:00, Troy Benjegerdes <[email protected]> wrote: >On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 03:55:23PM -0400, grarpamp wrote: >> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 1:37 PM, John Young <[email protected]> wrote: >> > NYT today has book review on gradual replacement of humans >> > by robots, a beloved investment of those at the top, so John Deere >> >> Shame no one properly broke the last 3-5 messages off into a >> separate thread when it went off noscript. >> >> What will happen to the 7000000000 unpaid system redundancies? > >We don't need the money, the money needs us, and I expect something >like >6,999,999,900 redundancies will suddenly find themselves with various >forms >of basic income guarantees once the money finally figures out it's >automating >itself out of job, and realizes it needs to start giving the HCF (human >confinement farms) money or humans are going to stop spending it, and >this, >my friends, would be the end of money. > >What's important for this cypherpunk is to figure out how to make sure >we have >alternatives and free choice to leave the HCFs and choose among many >basic >income systems, or make the choice to not use money at all. > >Are blockchains a reasonable thing to build a basic income system on? >How do >you ensure a blockchain private key is held or controlled by only one >person, >so that one cannot simply create many anonymous IDs and collect several >hundred >basic income guarantees? > >It seems there must be a human factor, and something that looks a lot >like a >government, but I can't quite wrap my head around how to make sure each >of >those 7e9 redunancies can only create 7e9 basic income generating >accounts, and >do a moderately good job of identifying and stopping those that try to >collect, >via force, coercion, or deceit, more than their share of basic income. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
