On Thu, 28 May 2015 13:00:25 +0900 Lodewijk andré de la porte <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2015-05-28 12:59 GMT+09:00 Juan <[email protected]>: > > > Last time I checked the stuff that can be owned(i. e. > > property) like say a hamburguer a car or a house, cannot > > abandon me, destroy me or shape me to its liking. > > > > The joke's on you! Ownership is defined in constitutions, and is not > a real thing at all! Sure. Since your knowlege of legal systems and moral philosophy doesn't go beyond crass, mainstream, legal positivism then your nonsense must be right. > > News businesses are supposed to operate in a market environment, > meaning that a shitty newscaster will disappear due to market > effects. Fox is not disappearing, yet it's exceedingly shitty. What's > up? It's also still getting decent views. What's up? > > I'd like to to be illegal so that someone can just put an end to the > bs. So there isn't any real standard for property but you think that the government must stop something you don't like on TV? Wait. And you dishonestly ignored the fact I just mentioned. Fox news IS the government. Why would they outlaw themselves? You don't like the real outcome of (your) stupid government theories? =)
