On 5/28/15, Lodewijk andré de la porte <[email protected]> wrote: > Capacity to earn > currency is the great selector,
-a- great selector -the- current great selector Our language can shape our thinking - the reason I comment here, not to be picky. And on that note, I'm sure you can come up with even "better" variations on the phrase. > but in an economic reality detached from reality by > countless systems and arbitrary human judgement, the > selector is detached and arbitrary too. Detached yes. Arbitrary in some sense, but certainly not absolutely. > It is well imaginable that ownership and currency are ineffective; Don't agree with that. Sub-optimal for certain "desired outcomes" perhaps. > but it is so ingrained in society > that we never consider it anymore. s/never/don't often/ s/consider it/challenge it/ > Possessiveness is human, and the human being is > not calibrated for today's society. This sounds potentially very interesting. A concept on the tip of my mind but can't quite get. Please elaborate here if you will. > There's that familiar senseless anger again. > Why do you do that? Where does > it help you go? Can you control it? These are good questions. I can relate with them for myself. Thank you for patiently asking. Regards Zenaan
