On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 02:06:22PM +0000, Alfonso De Gregorio wrote: > On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Georgi Guninski <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 11:45:07AM +0000, Peter Gutmann wrote: > >> The real question though is, why would anyone use parameters they didn't > >> generate themselves? All DSA implementations I've seen (apart from some > > > > What about MITM in DH -- where do you get the keys from > > in this case? > > A key-recovery attack may allow the retroactive decryption of past > communication sessions, if the network endpoints rely on fixed > Diffie-Hellman. Of course, whenever an attacker can successfully mount > a MITM attack the current sessions are compromised. >
Thanks. Are you referring to "DH as per the fucked RFC" or as "DH implemented properly"?
