On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 03:21:30PM +0000, Alfonso De Gregorio wrote: > On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Georgi Guninski <[email protected]> wrote: > ... > >> I'm concerned with Fixed Diffie-Hellman implemented properly. > >> > > > > Do you have example of application which distinguishes proper DH from > > non-proper DH? > > I'm confused. What do you mean by proper DH vs non-proper DH? Are you > referring to the performance of group parameters validation or lack of > the same, or something else? >
I mean: non-proper DH is implementation which doesn't return error/aborts if $q$ is composite. $q$ is defined in the RFC.
