I found the logs on the USB before I posted about the GCHQ slide, that's how I found the info. I verified that the data was also in coderman's torrent from over a year ago. John rebuffed my initial inquiry and refused to verify that the IPs I provided visited Cryptome at the times listed, and then accused me of faking the data. So I released it for others to look at themselves.
As far as calling Snowden a liar, as I said in note #4 of the GCHQ post... If the slide is a mockup, it could be an internal mockup produced by GCHQ, > a deliberate piece of disinformation from within or without GCHQ, a > document altered by Snowden, his friends/"friends" in Russia, or anyone > else in the chain of custody. *Given that Snowden didn't review all of > the documents he handed over, he might not recognize if one had been > altered, embellished, forged, or taken out of context prior to publication.* > Or it could be genuine - proving that something could be a fake isn't quite > the same as proving it's a fake. Italics added. On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Georgi Guninski <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 10:23:12PM -0400, Michael Best wrote: > > A few days ago, a new Snowden slide > > < > https://theintercept.com/2015/09/25/gchq-radio-porn-spies-track-web-users-online-identities/ > > > > was > > released that appeared to show that the GCHQ was monitoring Cryptome in > > Dude, are you calling Snowden liar? > > And did you found out that allegedly cryptome shipped their web logs on > usbs to buyers AFTER you called Snowden liar? >
