To prove the GCHQ slide could've been fake, getting John to fix the leak and stop calling me a liar. Same as I've said all along. How is that implausible?
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Razer <[email protected]> wrote: > Got it. Totally altruistic motivation... > > > On 10/10/2015 01:46 PM, Michael Best wrote: > > "Any money" is still more than I'll make off this. My only compensation is > a headache from ridiculous accusations. > > Any chance you hold this same standard to Snowden and consider his press > coverage as > "an ongoing for-profit commercial motivation as redistributor" for the NSA > docs? > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Oct 10, 2015, at 16:39, Razer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 10/10/2015 01:35 PM, Michael Best wrote: > > Nope, laughing at someone who has no idea how little a media mention is > worth in terms of money. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > Yes I do and it depends on how much money you consider 'money'... For > some, paying the rent is enough. Ask any artist or musician. > > RR > > > > On Oct 10, 2015, at 16:33, Razer < <[email protected]>[email protected]> > wrote: > > Nervous laugh... > > On 10/10/2015 01:32 PM, Michael Best wrote: > > I say Best's name's appearance in DailyDot or >> any other media constitutes an ongoing for-profit commercial motivation >> as redistributor. > > > HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. > > > > >
