On 10/10/2015 05:10 PM, Michael Best wrote: >> >> If Mike had uploaded them without full inspection, no problem. But, as I >> understand the narrative, he knowingly uploaded them. > > > I found them after uploading them, as I and the Daily Dot article said.
Also, just to be clear, here's how I would have handled this. So I have these Cryptome archives. And I upload them to the Internet Archive. And then I notice that [what the fuck!] they include weblogs! And so I contact the Internet Archive, and make sure that they don't propagate my upload. Then I remove the weblogs from the Cryptome archives, and upload them to the Internet Archive. Then I email JYA etc etc etc. For whatever that's worth ;) > He discovered the files when he uploaded the contents of the sticks to the >> Internet Archive, Best told the Daily Dot in a Twitter message. “Scrolling >> down through the list, I found about a hundred awstats log files listed in >> a row,” he said, referring to Cryptome analytics data. > > > > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Michael Best <[email protected]> wrote: > >> To prove the GCHQ slide could've been fake, getting John to fix the leak >> and stop calling me a liar. Same as I've said all along. How is that >> implausible? >> >> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Razer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Got it. Totally altruistic motivation... >>> >>> >>> On 10/10/2015 01:46 PM, Michael Best wrote: >>> >>> "Any money" is still more than I'll make off this. My only compensation >>> is a headache from ridiculous accusations. >>> >>> Any chance you hold this same standard to Snowden and consider his press >>> coverage as >>> "an ongoing for-profit commercial motivation as redistributor" for the >>> NSA docs? >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Oct 10, 2015, at 16:39, Razer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10/10/2015 01:35 PM, Michael Best wrote: >>> >>> Nope, laughing at someone who has no idea how little a media mention is >>> worth in terms of money. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> >>> Yes I do and it depends on how much money you consider 'money'... For >>> some, paying the rent is enough. Ask any artist or musician. >>> >>> RR >>> >>> >>> >>> On Oct 10, 2015, at 16:33, Razer < <[email protected]>[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Nervous laugh... >>> >>> On 10/10/2015 01:32 PM, Michael Best wrote: >>> >>> I say Best's name's appearance in DailyDot or >>>> any other media constitutes an ongoing for-profit commercial motivation >>>> as redistributor. >>> >>> >>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
