I'd rather have what you call 'lazy' over nothing. The ideal is all distribution modes available: "Keep the info off the dark web, off the deep web and in the search indexes."
Cryptome shows up on google searches. Your onion does not. -Travis On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Mirimir <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/11/2015 06:20 PM, Travis Biehn wrote: > > A billboard doesn't need much 'security.' *shrug* > > Well, there are the access logs ;) > > It ought to be an onion service, no? No sure bet, of course, but better > than nothing. In my opinion. > > Putting it all on users is awfully lazy, I think. > > > Travis > > > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015, 8:18 PM John Young <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >>> I would not have expected Cryptome to be on shared hosting ;) But yes, > >>> that would explain it. > >> > >> Shared is cheap, so are we. Shared is vuln, so are we. So are the others > >> despite credentials and billion-dollar armaments and above all else > >> secrecy and shallow oversight. That explains it. > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > -- Twitter <https://twitter.com/tbiehn> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn> | GitHub <http://github.com/tbiehn> | TravisBiehn.com <http://www.travisbiehn.com> | Google Plus <https://plus.google.com/+TravisBiehn>
