On 10/11/2015 07:49 PM, Travis Biehn wrote: > I'd rather have what you call 'lazy' over nothing.
Look, I mean no disrespect to Cryptome. But I do think that there ought to be a warning for users to protect themselves, if they don't want their access logged by everyone and their little yellow dog. > The ideal is all distribution modes available: "Keep the info off the dark > web, off the deep web and in the search indexes." > > Cryptome shows up on google searches. Your onion does not. Well, Cryptome has been around for about 20 years, so hey ;) But Google is indexing it. And it shows up well enough in relevant searches. But I haven't been promoting it very much. > -Travis > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Mirimir <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 10/11/2015 06:20 PM, Travis Biehn wrote: >>> A billboard doesn't need much 'security.' *shrug* >> >> Well, there are the access logs ;) >> >> It ought to be an onion service, no? No sure bet, of course, but better >> than nothing. In my opinion. >> >> Putting it all on users is awfully lazy, I think. >> >>> Travis >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015, 8:18 PM John Young <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>> I would not have expected Cryptome to be on shared hosting ;) But yes, >>>>> that would explain it. >>>> >>>> Shared is cheap, so are we. Shared is vuln, so are we. So are the others >>>> despite credentials and billion-dollar armaments and above all else >>>> secrecy and shallow oversight. That explains it. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > >
