*wiggles eyebrows* didn't think that would take this long to mention. Don't forget the conspicuous use of gmail and suspiciously legitimate names.
Can't trust em. -Travis On Mon, Oct 12, 2015, 12:46 PM Shelley <[email protected]> wrote: > On October 12, 2015 9:31:40 AM Razer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > His use of a sig with all his social networks is one of the reasons I > > earlier said Best has some income-related motive, and that he's most > > likely dealing in 'future rewards'. After all BB is a contributor to the > > intercept and even that cheap ass street panhandler "Commander X" aka > > 'curbhugger chris' got a whole damn writeup in the New Yorker. > > > > RR > > > > Razor, what has gotten into you? > > The only social network sig block I've seen is this: > > --- > Twitter <https://twitter.com/tbiehn> | LinkedIn > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn> | GitHub < > http://github.com/tbiehn> > | TravisBiehn.com <http://www.travisbiehn.com> | Google Plus > <https://plus.google.com/+TravisBiehn> > -- > > There has been a lot of noise on the list so I could have missed it, but I > don't recall seeing Mike post anything like that (whereas the above is > posted in each of Travis's replies, and I don't see you calling him out for > it.) Georgi asked Mike if he was NatSecGeek, that's the only time I recall > his Twatter being mentioned. > > If you're going to attack someone, at least get the facts straight. > > -S > > >
