On 4/3/16, Zenaan Harkness <[email protected]> wrote: > Today, Reddit deleted wording in its > transparency report that would normally indicate that they had not > received any "national security letters" or "other classified requests > for user information." Such "national security...
Some blogs say NSL's are unconstitutional violating: - the Fourth (are not warrants/subpoenas/orders reviewed signed by judge). - the First (being extralegal as such, there is no legal prior restraint). [As if "legal" PR is constitutional in itself.] >From tens of thousands of NSL's, only maybe three cases have followed that with courage to fight it. Probably none have conscientiously object, ie: ignoring and speaking first instead of asking permission.
