Zenaan Harkness wrote: > Here and there someone pokes their illogical head up and says "Warrant > canaries can't work" or "warrant canaries will get you introuble with > the law" or some variation on the theme. It boggles me fookin marnd, > it do. Perhaps this story can help massage some of those mental > tensions...
From what I've read the legal department at reddit isn't really sure whether it violated the law by killing it's canary. -- RR "Through counter-intelligence it should be possible to pinpoint potential trouble-makers ... And neutralize them, neutralize them, neutralize them" > > https://yro.slashdot.org/story/16/04/01/0321257/reddit-deletes-surveillance-warrant-canary-in-transparency-report > > "Reddit Deletes Surveillance 'Warrant Canary' In Transparency Report > >From the deductive-reasoning department > Arthur Dent '99 writes: Today, Reddit deleted wording in its > transparency report that would normally indicate that they had not > received any "national security letters" or "other classified requests > for user information." Such "national security... > " > > > fooking fook! >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
