On 07/01/2016 01:28 PM, juan wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 19:39:04 -0600 > Mirimir <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> >>> Yeah. Ask Ulbricht. Or the guys from agora who made it >>> quite clear that tor doesn't work. Or freedom hosting, or or or >> >> Ulbricht went down because associates fucked up, got busted, and >> cooperated with investigators. Also, it seems that his OPSEC sucked. > > You parroted bullshit from the feds : you earned -10 points
So what do you say actually happened? What are your sources? > [deleted lots of dishonest bullshit] > > > >> >>>> But the important point is that >>>> Tor has overall reduced state power. >>>> >>> >>> Yeah well. Sounds nice. Too bad there's zero evidence for >>> that claim. Actually the claim is pretty absurd. How can a project >>> of the US military whose purpose is to serve the US military >>> and the US state 'reduce state power'? >> >> By providing freedom and privacy for state subjects. > > > Still waiting for the evidence that 'proves' your absurd claim. I know quite a few :) > The tor project is good for the military and state. Therefore > it's bad for the military's and the state's victims. > > Buy yeah, first rule of the torbot : play dumb and parrot > propaganda. > > >> >> As much as I sympathize for victims of criminal states, I believe that >> anonymity systems are essential for protecting privacy and freedom. I >> also believe that they may eventually reduce state power >> substantially. Although that's seeming more and more like a dream. > > OK. This is the first reasonable and honest thing you said. > > You finally acknowledge that all your bullshit is a > 'dream' - it's not reality and not true. That's fundamentally the cypherpunk dream, I believe. So why do you bother being on this list, if you think that it's all bullshit?
