On 07/19/2016 02:31 AM, Mirimir wrote: > On 07/18/2016 03:39 PM, juan wrote: >> On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 04:45:19 -0600 >> Mirimir <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> My current working hypothesis is that Tor is not broken/breakable by >>> design. >> >> keep sucking mirimir - your friend syverson isn't fully >> satisfied yet. > He's not my friend, Juan. He works for the fucking US Navy, after all. > > But I do respect him. Think about it. He and his friends got US military > funding for a project that provided deniable and secure communication, > but only by making it public, for use by both funders and their enemies. > > It might be that this vulnerability was crucial for selling it to US > military. But that's distinguishable from the argument that it's > intentionally designed to be vulnerable. There's also the fact that > nobody has come up with anything practical that's not vulnerable to > global adversaries. So it seems unlikely that he had such a design that > he put aside as unsellable. > >
You're arguing logically with a brain-dead troll Mirimir...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
