On 07/20/2016 10:03 AM, Rayzer wrote: > > > On 07/19/2016 02:31 AM, Mirimir wrote: >> On 07/18/2016 03:39 PM, juan wrote: >>> On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 04:45:19 -0600 Mirimir <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> My current working hypothesis is that Tor is not >>>> broken/breakable by design. >>> >>> keep sucking mirimir - your friend syverson isn't fully >>> satisfied yet. >> He's not my friend, Juan. He works for the fucking US Navy, after >> all. >> >> But I do respect him. Think about it. He and his friends got US >> military funding for a project that provided deniable and secure >> communication, but only by making it public, for use by both >> funders and their enemies. >> >> It might be that this vulnerability was crucial for selling it to >> US military. But that's distinguishable from the argument that >> it's intentionally designed to be vulnerable. There's also the >> fact that nobody has come up with anything practical that's not >> vulnerable to global adversaries. So it seems unlikely that he >> had such a design that he put aside as unsellable. >> >> > > You're arguing logically with a brain-dead troll Mirimir...
I don't consider Juan to be a troll. I get that he doesn't have much patience with those whom he sees as fools :) But being considered a fool has never bothered me ;) It's my favorite Tarot card.
