On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, Ben Laurie wrote: > > Since we're in hair-splitting mode, I should point out that "prevents > the denial of an act" is not equivalent to a "negation that something is > false". Of course, logically, it comes to the same thing, but then, so > does "assertion that something is true". Of course, the idea that you could 'prevent the denial of an act' is completely wrong. The explanation "All this fancy-schmancy crypto stuff is bullshit" is pretty much universally applicable. -Bram Cohen
- Non-Repudiation in the Digital Environment (was Re: Fir... R. A. Hettinga
- Re: Non-Repudiation in the Digital Environment (wa... Ian BROWN
- Re: Non-Repudiation in the Digital Environment... Derek Atkins
- Re: Non-Repudiation in the Digital Environ... Eric Murray
- Re: Non-Repudiation in the Digital Env... Ed Gerck
- Re: Non-Repudiation in the Digita... Rich Salz
- Re: Non-Repudiation in the Di... Ed Gerck
- Re: Non-Repudiation in the Digital Env... David Honig
- Re: Non-Repudiation in the Digita... Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: Non-Repudiation in the Di... Ben Laurie
- Re: Non-Repudiation in th... Bram Cohen
- Re: Non-Repudiation in th... Ed Gerck
- Re: Non-Repudiation in the Di... Ed Gerck
- Re: Non-Repudiation in th... Ed Gerck
- Re: Non-Repudiation in th... Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: Non-Repudiation in th... Ed Gerck
- Re: Non-Repudiation in th... Mac Norton
- Re: Non-Repudiation in th... Mac Norton
- Re: Non-Repudiation in th... Ed Gerck
- Re: Non-Repudiation in th... Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: Non-Repudiation in th... Ed Gerck