On 09/03/2016 04:03 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >>> Is it possibly less than 'constructive' to dishearten individuals before >>> they've even begun? >> >> So maybe do something, instead of talking so much about it. > > Specific action has been underway for a few years, expecting about 2 to > go. Will report here when success of course. > >>> Could doing so, in the context of "fly below the radar with compliance >>> with the state" be seen as, I dunno, statist propaganda perhaps? >> >> Are you fucking serious? > > Yes. > > "do not oppose the state publicly" is easy to read as "comply with the > state".
What I mean is don't get caught opposing the state. Where you have an oppressed majority that acknowledges its oppression, nonviolent resistance is a viable option. India. US south. South Africa. But it's hard so see how that would work in Australia, for example. But hey, if going down as a martyr is your trip, go for it! > This is hard to read in an anarchist context as anything other than > directly counter to the foundation principles of anarchism. I don't care much about labels. There is no "anarchism". > Do you say there's some flaw in this reasoning? Yeah, I did :)
