> the.grugq at gmail.com: > panacea No shit. Prevention is the point of Tor, not damage mitigation, i.e., "healing"
> privacy activist cult TIL: privacy = cult > I got triggered What a fagq > strong security posture It is only posturing, isn't it > security (and/or privacy) Without security there is no privacy; isn't this guy a philosopher king; wtf > VPN provides the same protections Bullshit, VPNs are guaranteed to fail Tor is at least a gamble, until trust-aware path selection enables a better experience > Tor has only one use case to evade the authorities This fuckq with the pro-LEA false narratives > VPNs are (typically) not actively malicious Neither are "whites" > and you have no good reason to use it > except as an evasion tool against state authorities Again with the false narratives > Tor Browser Bundle is the worst browser possible I guess he never used IE/Edge or Chrome What a newb > Anonymity is essentially a property of a system that ensures any user > is equally likely to be the source of an event This guy is fucking retarded Not knowing who dun it doesn't mean it could be anybody > Diversity is obviously less good for anonymity Seeing a user as a regular Chrome, FF, or Safari user does more for anonymity than Tor homogeneity > Global Passive Adversary It is clear that they are actively attacking people, why use inaccurate labels
