On 01/24/2017 01:04 AM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote: > Please, John, I know I need to give you (and a lot of people here, oops!) > a lot of answers, but I'm ending (at least trying, I swear, Oda!) a lot > of things in this moment.
That's good, I think :) > If possible, please make Mirimir happy and give him some feedback about > this project. I liked the idea of Fast Data Transfer via Tor, but I'm not > the best person to give an opinion because I have almost no technical > knowledge. You know, I need to learn how to code decently because it's a > more useful skill than being a lawyer. Everybody hates lawyers! :((( What I need is help understanding the privacy implications. I'm going to explore possibilities for moving long transfers randomly across sets of subflows. Using "roundrobin" as mptcp_scheduler instead of "fullmesh" would be a start. That would also spread load across more relays. Another possibility is aggregating OnionCat and GarliCat links, so transfers would be split between Tor and I2P. > I was thinking about forwarding this message to Tor-Talk list to get more > feedbacks, but I was kick-banned there and I need to pretend that I'm not > reading the list anymore! :P :P :P I'm not expecting constructive feedback from Tor devs :( > Thank you very much! :* <3 > > ​Ceci > ------- > "Don't let anyone rob you of your imagination, your creativity, or your > curiosity. It's your place in the world; it's your life. Go on and do all > you can with it, and make it the life you want to live." - Mae Jemison > > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 5:46 AM, Mirimir <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Using OnionCat and MPTCP, one can transfer data between servers via Tor >> at ~50 Mbps. With multiple targets, source servers can push ~200 Mbps. >> It's obviously not very anonymous. But it's probably more anonymous than >> using VPN services. That's for servers with gigabit uplinks, by the way. >> >> https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmUDV2KHrAgs84oUc7z9zQmZ3whx1NB6YDPv8ZRuf4dutN/ >> >
