From: Razer <g...@riseup.net>
On 02/12/2017 05:16 PM, jim bell wrote:
From: Razer <g...@riseup.net>
>>>Accounts created specifically to harass. But they aren't saying how:
>>> https://blog.twitter.com/2017/an-update-on-safety
>>> ...and no one writing it up seems to know either
>>What I want to know, is: What is their definition of the word, "harass"?
>>Contradict? Disprove? Argue against? Make unhappy?
>>Is Twitter going to adopt a consistent policy that political statements
aren't allowed? >> Jim Bell
>Ask @Support or @jack. Maybe they can tell you.
>I would guess it's what their policy always was. If you think their policy is
>'inconsistent' that's because it depends on who gets harassment complaints
>against them that are verifiable.
But I'm still waiting for a definition of "harassment". Do you have your own?
Jim Bell
