On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 07:45:00AM +0000, jim bell wrote: > > > From: Razer <g...@riseup.net> > On 02/12/2017 05:16 PM, jim bell wrote: > > From: Razer <g...@riseup.net> > > >>>Accounts created specifically to harass. But they aren't saying how: > >>> https://blog.twitter.com/2017/an-update-on-safety > >>> ...and no one writing it up seems to know either > > >>What I want to know, is: What is their definition of the word, "harass"? > >>Contradict? Disprove? Argue against? Make unhappy? > >>Is Twitter going to adopt a consistent policy that political statements > aren't allowed? >> Jim Bell > > >Ask @Support or @jack. Maybe they can tell you. > > >I would guess it's what their policy always was. If you think their policy > >is 'inconsistent' that's because it depends on who gets harassment > >complaints against them that are verifiable. > But I'm still waiting for a definition of "harassment". Do you have your > own?
"Razzer's gone wild" - definitions for the modern man: harassment - marketing / propaganda fascist - marketing / propaganda tolerant - marketing / propaganda liberal - marketing / propaganda inclusive - marketing / propaganda