Russia's Fundamental Disagreement with the West About WWII,
Hitler, Jews and Race
https://russia-insider.com/en/russias-fundamental-disagreement-west-about-wwii-hitler-jews-and-race/ri28264
https://www.unz.com/tsaker/our-fundamental-disagreement-about-wwii-hitler-jews-and-race/
http://thesaker.is/our-fundamental-disagreement-about-wwii-hitler-jews-and-race/
...
What we can immediately see is that there are significant differences
between what took place in modern Russia and in the modern Ukraine, including:
An example of a crucial geographical difference would be “pogroms” which,
contrary to western propaganda, pogroms all took place in what would be the
modern Ukraine today, never in Russia.
There is also a difference in time: Russians in the Ukraine were persecuted
by Poles and Jews for centuries whereas Russians in what is modern Russia today
were primarily persecuted by Bolshevik Jews “only” between 1917 and Stalin’s
purges of the party in the late 1930s.
And then, there is the crucial, truly immense, difference which WWII made.
Next, a look at what happened during World War II and the Nazi occupation
When the Nazis launched their attack on the Soviet Union there were a lot
of Russians and Ukrainians who welcomed the Nazis, not necessarily because they
liked the Nazi ideology but because many of them hated their Bolshevik
oppressors even more than they disliked the Germans. After all, the horrors of
the Civil War and of the Collectivization were still present in the mind of
millions of people both in the (newly created) Ukrainian SSR and in the Russian
SSR.
Sidebar:
I would like to remind all those who nowadays try very hard to forget it,
that the Nazi ideology characterizes both Russians and Ukrainians as subhumans
(Untermensch) whose sole purpose would be to serve their Aryan master race
overlords (Herrenvolk) in the newly conquered living space (Lebensraum). Simply
put: Hitler promised his followers that they would be very happy slave owners!
It is no wonder that the prospective slaves felt otherwise…
In the course of the war, however, profound differences began to emerge:
First, in the Ukraine, the Nazi ideology DID inspire a lot of nationalists
for the exact same reasons that Nazi ideology inspired nationalist Poles (who
were Hitler’s first most loyal allies only to later be betrayed by him). Over
the centuries the Papacy not only created the Ukrainian nationalist identity,
it then actively fostered it every time Russia was weakened (if that topic is
of interest to you, see here
https://thesaker.is/ukrainian-nationalism-its-roots-and-nature/
).
The bitter truth which folks in the West don’t like to be reminded of is
that the regimes of Petain, Franco, Pavelic, Pilsudksi, etc. were all created
and supported by the Papacy which, of course, also supported Bandera and his
Ukronazi deathsquads. As for Hitler himself, he was initially strongly
supported by the UK (just as Trotsky was supported by the Jewish bankers in the
US). Indeed, russophobia has a long and “distinguished” history in the West:
western leaders change, as do their ideological rationalizations, but their
hatred and fear of Russia always remains.
https://thesaker.is/guy-mettans-book-on-russophobia-is-a-must-read-for-any-person-interested-in-russia/
...
Last, but certainly not least, the demented and outright genocidal policies
of the Nazis in occupied Russia resulted in such a blowback that the war to
liberate Russia from the Nazis became a war of national survival which the vast
majority of Russians fully supported.
For the Ukrainian nationalists, WWII began as a God-sent chance to finally
bring about their dream to “drown all the Polaks and the Moskals in Kike
blood”, and then this dream was crushed by the Soviet counter-attack and
subsequent annihilation of most (about 80%) of the German military machine. And
while many Ukrainians (and Poles) did see the Soviets as their liberators from
the Nazi horrors, the Ukronazis obviously saw the Soviet Army solely as an
occupation force which they resisted for as long as they could (after the end
of the war, it still took the Soviets several years to finally crush the
Ukronazi underground). And while most Russians felt like they were the real
victors of WWII, the Ukronazi nationalists felt that they had been defeated.
Again. The same goes for the Poles, by the way (this trauma gave birth to
something I refer to as the “Pilban syndrome”
https://www.unz.com/tsaker/how-russia-should-deal-with-the-pilban-syndrome-pbs/
).
Now for the self-evident truism about Jews: while many Russians remained
acutely aware of the Jewish role in the Bolshevik revolution and, especially,
in the class terror which followed, they did not see ALL Jews as enemies of
Russia, especially not when
1. There were plenty of patriotic Jews who loved Russia and/or the USSR
2. That Hitler’s demented racism inevitably had to bring Jews and
Russians together, even if only for a while and mostly under the “common enemy”
heading.
3. Many (most?) Russians know for a fact that Nazi
concentration/extermination camps did, in fact, exist even if they did not kill
6M Jews, even if they had no gas chambers and no crematoria (except to deal
with insect-born diseases). Why? Because it was the Soviet military which
liberated most of these camps and because there were plenty of non-Jewish
Russians/Soviets in these camps. Finally, besides the camps themselves, most
Russians also know about the infamous Einsatzgruppen which probably murdered
even more Jews (and non-Jews) than all the concentration/extermination camps
combined. The fact is that Nazi atrocities are not seriously challenged by most
Russian historians.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einsatzgruppen
The bottom line is this: whatever (at the time very real) hostility history
had created between Jews and Russians, World War II had a huge impact on these
perceptions. That is not to say that the Russians have forgotten the genocidal
policies of Lenin and Trotsky, but only that after WWII, most Russians justly
felt that they were victors, not defeated losers.
The Ukrainian nationalists, in contrast, were “multi-defeat” losers: they
were defeated by the Germans, the Russians and even the Poles (who rarely
attack anybody unless their prospective victim is already agonizing or unless
there is some “big guy” protecting them – Churchill was quite right with his
“greedy hyena of Europe” comment!). And now, more recently, they were soundly
defeated not once, but TWICE, by the Novorussians. That kind of “performance”
will often result in a nationalistic reaction.
...
How could a person (Hitler) and an ideology (National-Socialism) be both
declared uniquely evil AND, at the same time, undergo at least a partial
rehabilitation in the same society? Simple! The only condition necessary to
make that happen is to condition people to accept cognitive dissonances and not
to be too troubled when they happen. The average citizen of the Empire has been
conditioned to accept, and even embrace, such cognitive dissonances quite
literally since birth and he has become very, very good at that. But there is
also a historiographical blowback in action here:
Following WWII and, especially, following the 1970s, the Zionists made
what I consider to be a disastrous mistake: they decided to present Hitler and
his ideology as some kind of special and unique form of evil which supersedes
any and all, past or even future, imaginable forms of evil. And just to make
sure that this claim would stick, they decided to add some highly specific
claims including the “official’” figure of 6 million murdered Jews, the gas
chambers and crematoria being the most famous ones, but there were many more
(including electrocution pools, human skin lamp shades and human fat soaps –
but which had to be ditched after being proven false). Eventually these claims
all came under very effective attack by the so-called “revisionist historians”
who have since proven beyond reasonable doubt that these specific claims were
false. That did not make these historians very popular with the rulers of the
Empire who, instead of allowing for of a healthy historical debate, decided to
make “revisionism” a criminally punishable thoughtcrime for which historians
could be jailed, sometimes for years! The reaction to that kind of abuse of
power was inevitable.
...
> > https://theoutline.com/post/8187/billionaires-are-not-people/
> > Reasons why you should kill a rich pig as soon as possible >>
...
> When turmoil strikes, the left eats its own.
>
> When turmoil strikes, it becomes politically correct, hallowed even, to let
> loose envy and jealousy, to decry the "wealth" of others and to blame those
> who collect money of any sort as evil and "to be blamed for all our ills".
>
> From the linked article above is the classic envy programming, with the end
> goal of "murder and mayhem on the streets":
>
> Two students purportedly overheard in a cafe, talking about someone having
> a billion dollars:
>
> "People actually have that amount, like that amount of currency — in money?
> And they’re just allowed to sort of... have it?"
>
> To portray such unthinking, such envy, such base human nature, to play on
> this in service of The Almighty Democratic Party etc etc, is absolutely,
> utterly despicable! Jordan Peterson is absolutely right about this
> particular point (notwithstanding his personal failings).
>
> This line of thinking, this "logic" if we can call it that for a moment, is
> an upholding of base human natures which ought be acknowledged and handled,
> not let loose as some "unspoken conspiracy, get out your torches and
> pitchforks now!"
>
> We don't handle the "problem of guns" by banning guns.
>
> And despite London Mayer Khan's limp brain and aural effluence to the
> contrary, we don't handle "the problem of knives" by banning knives.
>
> In EXACTLY the same way, we don't handle the problem of selfish or
> "insufficiently good" billionaires, by a Marxist revolution murdering every
> wealthy and intellectual human in sight. This call (as implied/ espoused in
> the above linked article) is absolutely pathetic!
>
> Marxos is perfectly on topic where he persistently reminds us of the
> Holodomor and its fundamental causes, where "wealthy" farmers who owned a cow
> (literally one cow), were murdered for their evil gotten "wealth", and those
> greedy mothers who collected the remnant grains left over after mechanised
> harvesting, were also murdered for their "thievery".
>
> "When we leave unchecked 'our' base human nature, we support bringing forth
> evil into our world."
>
>
> This endless call to "kill all the BAD people" is the Marxist Pol Pot regime
> reborn, nothing but Stalin's gulags in new robes.
>
> We HAVE to find a different way to transition between hierarchies other than
> widespread bloodshed, because as soon as the blood of one "bad oligarch" is
> justified, we co-incidently/ commensurately, justify our own murder; and we
> well know that in that case, murder, of millions of humans, will ultimately
> prevail.
>
> There's an old old saying "live by the sword, die by the sword".
>
> There is a flip side to every coin.
>
> Are we even capable of finding another way?
>
