This is important, folks - the below outlines the front line of human tracking
or "the mark of the beast", as well as some antidotes to that.
In this case, "The Ministry of Truth" attempts to achieve sufficient tacit
consent for ubiquitous monitoring via "smart"phones.
This is a highly slippery slope, and potentially catastrophic for our
individual and collective freedoms, so let's get a handle on this one...
Be warned: :: ----- crunch time is close - do everything you can to educate
people, because if insufficient people are educated on this issue, the tracking
that is coming ("mark of the beast") will be extraordinarily difficult to undo.
Coronavirus Australia live news: Government urges Australians to use tracing
app despite privacy fears
By Dan Colasimone
Updated April 17, 2020 15:43:40
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-17/coronavirus-australia-live-updates-covid19-latest-news/12155268
Deputy Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly has not ruled out making a
coronavirus tracing app compulsory if not enough people install it voluntarily.
"We start with voluntary and then we see how it goes," Professor Kelly told
an afternoon press conference.
http://livenews.abc.net.au/Event/Coronavirus_Australia_live_news :
Some more details on the government's coronavirus-tracking app
The app uses Bluetooth technology to track coronavirus victims and the
people they come in contact with.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-14/coronavirus-app-government-wants-australians-to-download/12148210
.. The Federal Government believes restrictions on the community could
be eased in the months ahead if there's more testing, greater surveillance of
those infected by the coronavirus and much faster tracing of those they've had
contact with.
The government’s given us some more detail, confirming data collected from
the app would be uploaded to a server in the event someone tests positive to
COVID-19.
This is significant, because some experts argue if the data is stored on a
server it would attract privacy threats from hackers, and would also act as a
disincentive for people to sign-up to the app.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-15/challenge-to-convince-australians-to-use-coronavirus-tracing-app/12151130
The government believes it needs at least 40 per cent of Australians to
opt-in in order for the app to be effective.
The minister responsible, Stuart Robert, has told Channel 7 the information
gathered will be transferred to a database, if the person who tests positive to
COVID-19 agrees.
"If you tested positive, the authorities would ask you to consent and that
will be uploaded to a secure server," he said.
"That's it, no one is tracking you, there is no surveillance."
In the above article, these words:
> The government believes it needs at least 40 per cent of Australians to
> opt-in in order for the app to be effective.
-really- mean "we need about 40% of Australians to opt in to voluntary fascist
tracking, in order to establish "legal persuasion" (sufficient numbers of
people, required to compel the courts to make orders against the interests of
the remainder of the people) and also political influence ("40% of people agree
with this already, we HAVE to enforce this upon everyone, to SAVE LIVES - so
please, THINK OF THE CHILDREN!").
This is the heart of why the above propaganda is so insidious - it is an
attempt to covertly introduce and impose a fascist human tracking regime, "by
the consent of the governed" - and to do this, all they need is about 40% of
the entire population to opt in.
Very fine Ministry propaganda, and opt-in fascism at its finest... Whoever
wrote up the above ABC article gets a Fascism 'Badge Of Covert Fascism' badge
award for "covert fascism".
---------------------------
Antidotes, when in times of viral or similar medical pandemic crisis:
- We each have the fundamental human right to isolate or quarantine ourselves
and our family, in order to protect ourselves and others.
- We do have a duty of care to one another, and we have the right to satisfy
this duty of care by isolating, if we contract a virus, in order to not spread
the disease to other humans.
- We have the fundamental human right to make informed decisions in regards
to our health, excepting that if we have a known contageous condition, that we
satisfy our duty of care to other humans in our community, for example by
quarantining or isolating ourselves.
- If we become infected, or if we are at risk of becoming infeced, we have
the right to make our own informed decisions about each and every medical
procedure (such as vaccination, intravenous vitamin C, etc) that we choose to
receive, or choose to not receive.
- Parents have the fundamental right to make informed decisions in relation
to their children, which right overrides (i.e. which is superior to) the
state's authority to impose any medical treatment, so long as the parent
satisfies their duty of care to other people within our community.
- Fundamentally, we each have the right to educate ourselves, to read and
otherwise to learn about the pros and cons of any and every medical treatment
which is suggested, recommended or otherwise "ordered" by the state, and we
have the right to choose to receive, and the right to choose to not receive,
such medical treatment.
