On 2020-10-16 05:43, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote: > On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 13:40:35 -0400 > Robert Hettinga <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Part 2. Two more to go... >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=n4qonsvSgAg&app=desktop >> > > So speaking of NSA shills, that's exactly the sort of thing I would > expect from one. The promotin of the idea that 'crypto' is a weapon against > tyranny when in practice it serves the tyrants a lot more than it serves > their victims. > > Cryptography is what allows big brother to control all of their big > brother backdoored hardware, for instance.
Crypto is a munition. You want to deny us weapons, but do not want the government denied weapons. Which is the position of every NSA shill whenever a committee gets together to construct a cryptographic standard. StrongSwan uses NSA approved standards. Wireguard uses no NSA standards, relying instead entirely on standards approved by Jon Callas as unelected president for life of symmetric cryptography and Daniel Bernstein as God King of asymmetric cryptography. So, do you oppose us using Wireguard to avoid exposing ips associated with the physical address where the state can find people to beat up?
