https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/professional-negligence/1490246/do-i-need-a-lawyer-when-a-dog-attacks-me


Pets are a valued part of our society. However, sometimes, owners or
keepers of pets create dangerous situations for both their pets and others.
United States
Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Photo of Taylor Rodney Marks
Photo of Jeremy M. Wilson
AUTHORS
Pets are a valued part of our society. However, sometimes, owners or
keepers of pets create dangerous situations for both their pets and others.
If you or a loved one is attacked by a dog, the damages can be serious.
>From medical bills to lost wages to permanent scarring and injury, a dog
attack may impact multiple aspects of your life. Navigating these issues
alone can become complicated quickly, and our team of personal injury
lawyers is here to guide you through it.

Types of Injuries
A dog owner or keeper may be liable for the dog's actions in numerous
instances. Typically, a dog bite comes to mind. However, a dog owner may
also be liable for a dog's aggressive conduct when the dog attacks another
person or another animal, causing another person injury. Even if the dog is
not intending to be aggressive, if a dog has a history of jumping on and
hurting individuals, the dog's owner may be liable if it jumps on you and
hurts you. Each situation is fact-specific and requires a detailed review
and investigation to determine whether a dog owner or keeper may be liable
for injuries.

Who Is Liable for a Dog Attack?
Navigating a dog bite or attack lawsuit can be difficult. Depending on the
situation, multiple individuals may be responsible for your injuries,
including:

The dog's owner;
The dog's keeper (someone who is caring for the dog, walking the dog, or
otherwise providing for the dog);
A property owner; and,
An individual who knew or reasonably should have known the dog was
dangerous and had sufficient ability and control to remove the danger posed.
Determining who is responsible is important, particularly in the world of
insurance. For example, if a visitor is injured by a dog while on the
property of another, that property owner's existing premises liability
insurance policy may be triggered. Even if a dog attack does not occur on a
landowner's property (for example, if it occurs on the sidewalk or at a
park), the pet owner's insurance policy may still be triggered. Further, if
the attack occurs on a rental property, multiple policies may be in play,
including the insurance policies of both the landlord and tenant. Put
simply, investigating liability in a dog attack can be complex.

When Is Someone Liable for a Dog Attack?
Next, it is important to determine when a dog owner or keeper is liable for
a dog attack. Liability for dog bites depends largely on whether an owner
or keeper was on notice that the dog was a "potentially dangerous" dog. For
example, if a dog has prior instances of biting or other vicious behavior,
a dog may be "potentially dangerous." A court will judge the vicious
propensities of animals by evidence of their previous behavior. Even if the
attack is the dog's first bite, the dog's prior behavior may be enough to
demonstrate it was potentially dangerous, and its owner knew or should have
known of the danger. Additionally, under North Carolina law, the dog's
breed itself may, alone, make the dog "potentially dangerous."

Statutory Strict Liability. The North Carolina General Assembly enacted
statutes specifically addressing dog attacks. Under N.C.G.S. § 67-4.4, the
owner of a dangerous dog is strictly liable for the civil damages from
injuries or property damage that the dog inflicts upon another's person,
property, or animal. This statute applies only to the dog's owner.

Under N.C.G.S. § 67-4.1, A "dangerous dog" is a dog who has either:

without provocation, killed or inflicted severe injury on a person; or
inflicted a bite on a person that resulted in broken bones or disfiguring
lacerations or required cosmetic surgery or hospitalization; killed or
inflicted severe injury upon a domestic animal when not on the owner's
property; or approached a person when not on the owner's property in a
vicious or terrorizing manner in an apparent attitude of attack.
Any dog owned or harbored, at least in part, for the purpose of dog
fighting or that was trained to dog fight is also a "dangerous dog" under
N.C.G.S. § 67-4.1.

Negligence Per Se. Towns, cities, and counties may enact ordinances that
further outline the duties and responsibilities of dog owners and keepers.
To prevail under a theory of negligence per se, the injured party must show
that the ordinance was enacted to protect a class of persons which included
the injured party, and the injury sustained was of the nature contemplated
in the statute. Whether ordinances apply to the attack depends largely on
where the injured party and dog were located at the time of the injury. For
example, "leash laws" require owners to keep dogs on leashes outside of
their property and require that a person walking the dog off of the
property is physically able to control the animal. Or, if an owner's dog
leaves the owner's property and attacks someone, that also violates the
ordinance. Further, a county ordinance may declare it unlawful for dogs to
be "public nuisances," which may include things like habitual or repeated
chasing, snapping, attacking, or barking at pedestrians. Certain ordinances
may completely forbid owners from bringing dogs to particular areas,
regardless of whether the dog is leashed. A violation of any town, city, or
county safety ordinance is negligence per se.

Common Law Negligence. Even if an owner or keeper does not violate a
statute or ordinance, they may still be liable for a dog attack under a
theory of negligence. If the owner or keeper of the dog knows from the
dog's past conduct that it is likely, if not restrained, to engage in
behavior that is foreseeable to result in injury to another, the owner or
keeper may be liable. An injured person must show that (a) the dog was in
fact vicious, and (b) the owner or keeper knew or should have known of its
vicious propensities. Additionally, under North Carolina law, the dog's
breed itself may charge the owner or keeper with constructive knowledge of
the dog's dangerous propensities.

Damages
A claim against a dog's owner for injuries sustained from their dog is a
personal injury claim. Like other personal injury claims, you are entitled
to specific categories of damages for your injuries, including:

Past, future, and present medical care and expenses;
Lost wages and diminished earning capacity;
Pain and suffering;
Permanency, scarring, and disfigurement; and,
Property damage.
In some cases, punitive damages may be available. Punitive damages are
designed to punish the bad actor and to deter similar conduct in the
future. Although they are less commonly awarded, if a dog's owner was
engaged in egregious conduct contributing to or causing the attack, you may
be entitled to receive punitive damages. A seasoned North Carolina personal
injury attorney can help you navigate all potential damages you are
entitled to receive after a dog attack.

As explained above, multiple parties may be liable for a dog attack.
Therefore, it is important to analyze liability fully to ensure you have
all routes for compensation secured.

Conclusion
A dog attack is traumatizing. If you or a loved one is injured under these
circumstances, it is important to contact an experienced North Carolina
personal injury attorney. Our law firm can help you navigate the incident,
including by protecting your rights, analyzing all potential sources of
liability, and guiding you through the legal process. Focus on your
recovery, and put the legal issues into our attorneys' hands.

ND:4874-5238-4717, v. 1

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the
subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific
circumstances.

Reply via email to