This is nonsense. Even if you, say, don't believe (gays|blacks|IRS agents)
should have any rights, and you assault or shoot one, you maintain your
rights under the criminal justice system. To a trial by jury, to be
confronted with the evidence against you, and so on. --Declan
At 03:39 AM 4/22/01 -0400, Phillip H. Zakas wrote:
>Bell's AP includes neither a system of due process nor a method for the
>accused to confront his accusor. do you think he's rejected the AP as
>invalid, or simply realizing how beneficial simple rights as these are when
>being accused of crimes? is it relevant to refer to these rights when he
>himself rejected those rights for others?
