Tim May quoting Zakas:
> At 3:39 AM -0400 4/22/01, Phillip H. Zakas wrote:
> > > > May says:
> >> > People have constitutional rights and these rights are not
> abrogated by
> >> > an "intervention."
> >>
> >> > A person may only be held or confined against his will if
> due process is
> >> > satisfied. This usually means at least a preliminary
> hearing, after the
> >> > usual "initial period" has passed.
> >
> >Bell's AP includes neither a system of due process nor a method for the
> >accused to confront his accusor. do you think he's rejected the AP as
> >invalid, or simply realizing how beneficial simple rights as
> these are when
> >being accused of crimes? is it relevant to refer to these rights when he
> >himself rejected those rights for others?
>
> 1. Bell was not charged with writing an illegal essay.
>
> 2. Bell was not charged with plotting to set up an AP lottery.
>
> 3. What Bell may or may not have written about does not affect in any
> way the operation of the U.S. legal system.
>
> 4. You need to think more critically.
<snip>
At nigh 4 a.m. on the tail of a "Saturday night" ...people get points for
typing.
~Aimee
