[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Criticizing the company is not disloyal. Turning up the heat when they
> fail to follow through on their promises is not unfriendly. Cypherpunks
> are actually helping their friends and allies within ZKS when they plainly
> state how unacceptable is the current state of the product with regard
> to privacy. Only when the company senses that cypherpunks are losing
> patience, that they are in danger of seeing articles appear in Wired
> or the Times saying that the company's dedication to privacy is being
> questioned, will they increase the priority of fixing these problems.
Then I guess we need to start critiquing -- I'd really like to
buy the product, and I have no problem with paying $50 @ year, but I'd never
pay a cent for anything like this that wasn't open source. Why? I could care
less who is involved with the company -- lots of people sell out.
But then I also *can't* use it because they have neither a linux
nor a Mac client. And I don't do windoz.
--
Harmon Seaver, MLIS Systems Librarian
Arrowhead Library System Virginia, MN
(218) 741-3840 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://harmon.arrowhead.lib.mn.us
