At 09:37 PM 2/5/2002 -0800, Tim May wrote: >On Tuesday, February 5, 2002, at 02:43 PM, Black Unicorn wrote: > >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On >>> Behalf Of Jim Choate >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:25 PM >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Subject: Re: What Kind Of Government...... >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Ed Stone wrote: >>> >>>> application of the Sullivan precedent, which states that the Fifth >>>> Amendment will never justify a complete failure to file a return, >>>> invalidates the Fifth Amendment defense. E. g., United States >>> v. Irwin, 561 >>> >>> Where is Congress or the Courts given the authority to invalidate any >>> of a >>> citizens rights? The decision as to what is and is not a valid defence >>> rests in one place and one place only. >>> >>> The jury. >>> >>> These sorts of laws violate the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, and >>> 10th. >> >> Don't forget the 2nd and 3rd as well as the 11th through 27th. (18th >> notwithstanding). >> > >Mr. Happy Fun Court is "Not Amused."
Gee, that's funny. Isn't this where "Tim May" says "Mr. Happy Fun Judge is 'Not Amused' and needs killing"? Shucks, did I ponder that?
