On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Meyer Wolfsheim wrote:

> On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Jei wrote:
> 
> > I've never taken the list to be for only my purposes.
> > I forward and post what I find relevant and interesting.
> 
> Your definition of relevant is... interesting. You were the one who
> forwarded the article about pentagrams in the sky above NYC, were you not?

Yeah, so what? At least he tried and doesn't spend 25%+ of his time
bitching because he doesn't get what he wants...grow up. An occassional
post thats 'off topic' is a hell of a lot more acceptable than the heavy
handed ego-bashing a handfull of you CACL miscreants spout on a regular
basis.

> > Maybe I should consult you every time before I post?
> 
> No. However, you should lurk on a mailing list for a few weeks before
> posting to get a feel for the tone and substance of the list. Notice that
> you are the highest volume poster of news articles (you've even beat
> Choate), that your news articles most often have nothing to do about
> crypto or related politics (such as civil liberties law), and that they
> haven't been well received.

Irrelevant, there is no limit or quota on this list (though individual
node operators are free to impliment one within their own subscription
domain). If the world of crypto, civil liberties, and economics is too
fast and furious for you to stay up with perhaps you should review your
own interests before criticizing others.

If you really, really, really, don't like the way the list is run pony up
your own time, money, and equipment and run your own node and moderate it
however you wish. Or start your own list (like there isn't precidence for
that).

> Also note that Choate's forwards aren't usually well received either
> (though his hit rate for being on topic seems to be a bit better than
> yours as well.)

This list is about cryptography, economics, and civil liberties. The vast
majority of my posts are DIRECTLY ON TOPIC. The secondary issue of whether
you got the clue(s) to put them together is another issue entirely. The
reality is that YOUR expection is what is lost in the ozone. In fact,
probably half of your posts are off topic (using your definition) because
they are nothing more than bitches at people about behaviour. Nothing to
do with the topics of this list at all.

I find it interesting that it's the same set of CACL folks who do the
bitching and pushing trying to get the rest of the list members to toe
their party line. Ain't gonna happen junior.


 --
    ____________________________________________________________________

                James Choate - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ssz.com

    --------------------------------------------------------------------


Reply via email to