On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Eric Murray wrote: > On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:36:29AM +0200, Jei wrote: > > > My logic tells me it is best to ensure the widest coverage to issues you > > care about, get as many sources as you can, and simply ram down the facts > > as many people's troats as you can, > > Many people on this list don't appreciate having stuff rammed > down their throats.
Many people learn to use filters. > This isn't a list for people who want to receive PR. It's a list > for discussing cryptography and the soceital impact of cryptography. There are *much* better lists for that purpose. Would you like me to post their info where to find them? Nah, I won't bother for you. Find 'em yourself, if you can. As to what is "PR", that's a question of perspective. But the point - you wouldn't know of the existence of "better" lists in the first place now, if I hadn't "rammed" the fact down your virtual troat... I guess I shouldn't have done that either. :P
