Then that's simply human nature, and the fact that it's not a behavior that hasn't been culled out of our gene pool indicates that it is a positive thing in terms of evolution.
Further it precludes the connection between government type and morals, so it is impossible to claim that any system is any better than any other simply because humans are corruptible. ----------------------Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos--------------------------- + ^ + :Surveillance cameras|Passwords are like underwear. You don't /|\ \|/ :aren't security. A |share them, you don't hang them on your/\|/\ <--*-->:camera won't stop a |monitor, or under your keyboard, you \/|\/ /|\ :masked killer, but |don't email them, or put them on a web \|/ + v + :will violate privacy|site, and you must change them very often. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sunder.net ------------ On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Aimee Farr wrote: > > This experiment demonstrates that people will screw each other > > irrespective of the government involvement. So, if the people are going > > to lie, cheat, steal, etc. w/o government of what possible use is CACL > > philosophy? It doesn't reduce anything, if anything it increases the > > potential for such actions because there is no constraint on individuals > > actions. If one neighbor kills another, what are the other neighbors going > > to do? > > > > Hatfield and McCoy. > > > > Choate has considerable support. The mark of a that type of society is > constant warfare. > > ~Aimee
