Source:
DRUDGE REPORT
http://www.drudgereport.com/

OCTOBER BULLETIN SAID AL-QAEDA TERRORISTS THOUGHT TO HAVE 10 KILOTON 
NUCLEAR WEAPON TO BE SMUGGLED INTO NEW YORK CITY
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash.htm

New York City 1 Megaton Surface Blast: Pressure Damage Map
http://pbs.vicinity.com/pbs/blast.hm?SEC=pressure&AD2=&AD3=New+York+Ci 
ty%2C+NY&AD4=U.S.&x=12&y=5

Sun Mar 03 2002

**TIME MAGAZINE**

New York -- In October, an intelligence alert went out to a small 
number of government agencies, including the Energy Department's 
top-secret Nuclear Emergency Search Team, based in Nevada.  The 
report said that terrorists were thought to have obtained a 
10-kiloton nuclear weapon from the Russian arsenal, and planned to 
smuggle it into New York City, a special TIME magazine investigation 
reveals.

Publishing sources tell the DRUDGE REPORT, the next cover story of 
TIME will headline: "Can We Stop the Next
9/11?"

The report hits newsstands Monday, March 4th.

MORE The source: a mercurial agent code-named DRAGONFIRE, who 
intelligence officials believed was of "undetermined" reliability, 
TIME reports.  But DRAGONFIRE'S claim tracked with a report from a 
Russian general who believed his forces were missing a 10-kiloton 
device.

That made the DRAGONFIRE report alarming.  So did this: detonated in 
lower Manhattan, a 10-kiloton bomb would kill some 100,000 civilians 
and irradiate 700,000 more, flattening everything in a half-mile 
diameter.

Counterterrorist investigators went on their highest state of alert, 
TIME reports.  "It was brutal," a U.S.  official told TIME.

It was also highly classified and closely guarded.

MORE Under the aegis of the White House's Counterterrorism Security 
Group, part of the National Security Council, the suspected nuke was 
kept secret so as not to panic the people of New York.  Senior FBI 
officials were not in the loop.  Former mayor Rudolph Giuliani says 
he was never told about the threat.  In the end, the investigators 
found nothing, and concluded that DRAGONFIRE'S information was false. 
But few of them slept better.

Counterterrorism experts and government officials interviewed by TIME 
say that for all the relative calm since Sept.  11, America's luck 
will probably run out again, sooner or later.  "It's going to be 
worse, and a lot of people are going to die," warns one U.S. 
counterterrorism official.  "I don't think there's a damn thing we're 
going to be able to do about it."


The DRUDGE REPORT has been briefed on other revelations coming from 
TIME's investigation:

The Coast Guard is arming itself against a possible terrorist attempt 
to destroy a major U.S.  coastal city by detonating a tanker loaded 
with liquified natural gas.

The Administration has recalled old CIA hands with experience in 
Central Asia.  Says an Administration official:
"You ended up going back to retirees because the bench was so light 
on Afghanistan.  We're still trying to get up to speed."

This week, Tom Ridge's office plans to announce a new color-coded 
alert system to warn local law enforcement and the public about 
threats within U.S.  borders, sources tell TIME.

While there is a genuine debate inside the government about whether 
Osama bin Laden is still alive, there is far less argument about what 
will happen after Washington is able to confirm that he is dead.  A 
U.S.  official told TIME last week that it is widely presumed that 
al-Qaeda sleeper cells will take retaliatory action once the 
terrorist leader is killed or proven dead.

"We're as vulnerable today as we were on 9/10 or 9/12," says 
presidential counselor Karen Hughes.  "We just know more."

Developing...

**************************************************************************
Subscribe to Freematt's Alerts: Pro-Individual Rights Issues
Send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words subscribe FA
on the subject line. List is private and moderated (7-30 messages per week)
Matthew Gaylor, (614) 313-5722  ICQ: 106212065   Archived at 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fa/
**************************************************************************

Reply via email to